kp1512 wrote:
Cancers and heart disease generally occur in older people, so one has to be fit to die from these, therefoe you cannot have any meaningful statistics on such disease and causes of death if your general population pops it's clogs before the age of 40 as the Chinese did before 1950.
The question of sanitation is ofcourse important and no doubt this is improving as China improves it's infastrucutre but as the Country spends above 5% of it's GWP on healthcare and people are now living to over 70 on average, you cannot ignore the fact that inoculations, drugs etc., are the main reason for this increase as thousands of years of "chinese medicine" didn't keep the fuckers alive for long!
Simon
The stats you refer to are flawed as not even China had a count of there death rates and it was all indicative but clearly miles out; and the WHO, UN et al didnt even have access inside China. Additionaly - China has a very severe issue with the number of people over 60 now - ie there are too many. This also blows the notion that back then it was 35 or whatever.
Even if we take into account development a very significant part of china still lives in poverty and there life expectancy is well over 70 now if you refer to both UN, China and WHO stats.
This to me says that even with development and health care - the large % dont even recieve it - they are living well past western figures.
Who cares? There's too many of them anyway!
The point I wish to make is that modern medicine is more effective than Chinese Medicine and if you ever get cancer, trust me, you'll want good old proven western medicine to save you. I know this mate...

